Welcome

The intent of Pilgrim Processing is to provide commentary on the Daily Lectionary from the 1979 Book of Common Prayer. The format for the comment is Old Testament Lesson first, Gospel, and Epistle with a portion of one of the Psalms for the day as a prayer at the end.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

14 November 2013




The author gets us up to date on rulers.  Darius, who had allowed the Jews to go back to Jerusalem was defeated by the man we know as Alexander the Great who is not criticized at all for his rulership of the territories but handed over his kingdoms to men of lesser caliber who made great evil.  From these came a sinful root, Antiochus Epiphanes, a man hated by the Jews.  He had himself been a hostage and this apparently made him ruthless. Some came out of Israel who thought it best to make common cause, throw in the sponge on this whole Yahweh thing, and accept the mores and ethics of their Gentile overlords.  The covenant is only as strong as the covenant partner you choose and they chose unwisely as Epiphanes soon demonstrated by conquering Egypt and then coming back to Jerusalem and plundering the temple completely.  When God's people make human alliances and covenants it is never a good thing.  They have lost faith in Him and are placing their trust that should be in Him in nations and kings.  What a silly idea but oh how easily we are seduced to thinking in such ways.

After Jesus healed all the people who went up the mountain and fed the four thousand with woefully inadequate food stocks the Pharisees come and ask for a sign.  Jesus' response is essentially I have given you a thousand signs and you can't interpret them, what good would another one be?  His oblique reference to the sign of Jonah surely confused them.  What was he talking about?  What was the "sign" of Jonah?  Jonah didn't even get the signs and he saw them first hand.  One can only imagine Jesus' head going limp to His chest when the disciples begin to worry about not having bread.  How could they possibly think He meant literal yeast in this circumstance?  The yeast of the Pharisees is unbelief, never coming to a conclusion that is fixed and settled.  The disciples are simply clueless at the moment.

Is it moral for heaven to rejoice over the destruction of the great city and all that live in it?  That is the same sort of question posed in connection with the Old Testament destruction of cities and all the inhabitants.  The words of the rejoicing tell us that from the perspective of heaven even this judgment is just and righteous.  We believe we are in a position to judge on a macro level and we live only the micro level.  We cannot stand in judgment of God because we can't see all He sees, we lack perspective.  It is only after the great city is judged that the wedding supper of the Lamb is announced.  This judgment is precursor to the final judgment.  John sees this angel and hears the proclamation, "These are the true words of God" and falls at his feet in worship.  He is told to rise and not do that, the angel is a fellow servant of the truth with John, the man.  That should give you room for pause.

No comments: